Hill v. Seattle First National Bank
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
Plaintiffs Brent C. Hill, Audrey Hill, Russell W. Mangum, Carole Mangum, and Hill-Mangum Investments (collectively “Hill-Mangum”) brought suit against Seattle First National Bank (“Seattle First”) alleging, inter alia, that it breached a contractual obligation to Hill-Mangum when it improperly tendered a loan to Hill-Man-gum to First Security for its purchase. As a result of the improper tender, First Security did not purchase the loan, to Hill-Mangum’s detriment. The trial court granted summary judgment for Seattle First, finding inter alia, that a prior federal court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Ron Case Roofing & Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. BlomquistUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Landes v. Capital City BankUtah Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Hall v. Utah State Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- K & T, INC. v. KoroulisUtah Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.