Legal Opinion

Hill v. Seattle First National Bank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1992No. 890375PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Plaintiffs Brent C. Hill, Audrey Hill, Russell W. Mangum, Carole Mangum, and Hill-Mangum Investments (collectively “Hill-Mangum”) brought suit against Seattle First National Bank (“Seattle First”) alleging, inter alia, that it breached a contractual obligation to Hill-Mangum when it improperly tendered a loan to Hill-Man-gum to First Security for its purchase. As a result of the improper tender, First Security did not purchase the loan, to Hill-Mangum’s detriment. The trial court granted summary judgment for Seattle First, finding inter alia, that a prior federal court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ron Case Roofing & Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. BlomquistUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Landes v. Capital City BankUtah Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hall v. Utah State Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. K & T, INC. v. KoroulisUtah Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API