Legal Opinion
Harline v. Barker
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 1996No. 940322, 940323PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:
This opinion addresses two appeals filed by Wesley G. Harline from separate grants of summary judgment, each in favor of the attorneys who represented Harline in connection with his bankruptcy before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah. After the bankruptcy court denied Harline’s bankruptcy discharge, Harline brought two legal malpractice actions, the first against defendants Pete N. Vlahos and the law firm Vlahos and Sharp (collectively “Vlahos”), and the second against defendants Ronald C. Barker and Larry Whyte.' Both sets of attorneys moved for…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,787 in Re John E. Tully, Debtor. Henry J. Boroff, Trustee in Bankruptcy of John E. Tully v. John E. TullyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- GeoMetWatch v. BehuninCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.