Legal Opinion

Spokane Merchants Ass'n v. Mussellman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1925No. 18975. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

The plaintiff brought this action on an assigned claim for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered. The defendants named in the original complaint were O. M. Mussellman, Berg Pattee and Frank Warren, and it was alleged that they were doing business as partners. At the time the action was begun, an attachment was issued and levied upon the property in question. The cause went to trial before the court without a jury, upon an amended complaint in which personal judgment was sought against Mus-sellman and Pattee, but not against Warren. The property was taken from the sheriff,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. ScarbroughWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Petri v. MannyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Spokane Merchants' Ass'n v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Kato v. Union Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. General Mercantile Co. v. WatersWashington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Cascade Fixture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tahoma Finance Co. v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. LaFray v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. BoersemaWashington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API