Miller v. Scarbrough
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered January 15, 1919, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to reinstate a chattel mortgage and for a foreclosure, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
The appellants Scarbrough, in March, 1918, gave to the respondent a mortgage upon their stock of drugs and fixtures. Thereafter this mortgage was cancelled, and in September, 1918, the appellants Scarbrough and Cowen, then being partners in the drug business, gave to the respondent a mortgage upon the stock and fixtures. Respondent alleges that this cancellation was induced by false representations, relying upon which he was persuaded to satisfy the first mortgage and accept the new note and mortgage. In November, 1918, the appellants Scarbrough and Cowen made a common law assignment for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ephraim v. KelleherWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Keyes v. SabinWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Byrd v. Forbes, Washington Territory1887
- Van Winkle v. MitchumWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Nason & Co. v. StackWashington Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Cascade Fixture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Burg Bros. v. BercutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Puget Sound Pulp & Timber Co. v. Clear Lake Cedar Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Asbury v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- General Mercantile Co. v. WatersWashington Supreme Court · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.