Tahoma Finance Co. v. Shannon
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
In this action upon a promissory note and for the foreclosure of an alleged chattel mortgage, appellant intervened by permission of the court and set up by answer two affirmative defenses to the amended complaint of respondent. The first affirmative defense, briefly summarized, is as follows:
That defendants Shannon and Basher as copartners, under the name of Metropolitan Stationery, operated a store at 508 Union Street, Seattle, in the business of buying and selling stationery and similar merchandise at retail. On June 15,1923, they gave respondent their note for $1,600, and at the same time…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blenz v. FogleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Keyes v. SabinWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Miller v. ScarbroughWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Clark v. KilianWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Carlson Bros. v. Weidauer & Lansdown Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Cascade Fixture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Warner v. HiblerWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- United States Rubber Co. v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. BoersemaWashington Supreme Court · 1941