Petri v. Manny
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered March 17, 1917, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The respondent, on October 24, 1916, commenced an action against the appellants Manny on three causes of action, one being for goods sold the Mannys, and the other two for goods furnished other parties at their request. At the same time, a writ of attachment was sued out and levied upon a boom of logs belonging to the appellants. On November 10, 1916, the logs were released on the filing of a bond with the appellant London & Lancashire Indemnity Company as surety. On November 14, 1916, the respondent *602served an amended complaint in which was included three additional causes of action upon…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Bates v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Brady v. OnffroyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Morrison v. FishelIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United Surety & Indemnity Co. v. Bayamón Steel Processors, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2004
- Boeing Employees' Credit Union v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Caine & Weiner v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Waller v. HeinrichsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.