Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1937No. Civ. 10286PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

—The plaintiff Max Jackson, alleging he was libeled by certain portions of a news article appearing in the “Underwriters’ Report”, a San Francisco weekly newspaper published by defendants in the interests of the insurance business, brought this action to recover compensatory and punitive damages. The cause came on for trial before a jury, and at the conclusion of plaintiff’s ease the trial court granted defendants’ motion to strike out all evidence upon the ground that the complaint failed to state a cause of action and to grant a nonsuit. From the judgment entered in defendants’ favor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Gosewisch v. DoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Locke v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Inderbitzen v. Lane HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Frankfield v. FreibergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gautier v. General Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Holden v. PIONEER BROADCASTING CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Freeman v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API