Legal Opinion

Frankfield v. Freiberger

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1932No. Docket Nos. S.F. 13963, 14276PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The above-entitled actions arose out of a dispute over an agreement of sale of certain real property. Appellant Freiberger agreed to buy, and respondents agreed to sell, an apartment house for the sum of $16,500. The buyer was to pay $4,100 down and the payment of the balance was to be secured by two mortgages or deeds of trust. Appellant paid the said sum of $4,100 in escrow to Alameda County Title Insurance Company. Subsequently she demanded the return of the money from the escrow-holder, and served notice of rescission upon respondents, chiefly on the grounds of defective title…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. BeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API