Frankfield v. Freiberger
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above-entitled actions arose out of a dispute over an agreement of sale of certain real property. Appellant Freiberger agreed to buy, and respondents agreed to sell, an apartment house for the sum of $16,500. The buyer was to pay $4,100 down and the payment of the balance was to be secured by two mortgages or deeds of trust. Appellant paid the said sum of $4,100 in escrow to Alameda County Title Insurance Company. Subsequently she demanded the return of the money from the escrow-holder, and served notice of rescission upon respondents, chiefly on the grounds of defective title…
2Cited by35 opinions
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. BeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.