Gosewisch v. Doran
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for libel. The defendants demurred to an amended complaint, and the court below sustained their demurrers and gave judgment in their favor. The plaintiff appeals.
The amended complaint charges that in January, 1909, the defendants, as plaintiffs, commenced an action in the superior court of Los Angeles County, against the plaintiff herein and others as defendants. In said action they “maliciously and without reasonable or probable cause” filed a complaint in which they charged plaintiff with the misappropriation and embezzlement of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Runge v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Bartlett v. ChristhilfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Werner v. Southern California Associated NewpapersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Bradley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.