Legal Opinion

Locke v. Mitchell

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1936No. L. A. 15823PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

A general demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint having been sustained without leave to amend, plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal subsequently entered.

The action is one for libel, and is based upon a letter alleged to have been written and published by the defendants. The complaint alleges that plaintiff is an attorney who for more than twenty years before the publication of the letter complained of specialized in municipal corporation law and served either as assistant secretary or secretary of the League of California Municipalities, an association composed of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Snively v. Record Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Bates v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Gilman v. McClatchyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Taylor v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Kapellas v. KofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API