Legal Opinion

Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor Council

California Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1943No. Sac. 5602PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

During a labor dispute between George W. Emde and Lois E. Marshall, the owners of a dairy business, and Teamsters’ Local No. 439, the Stockton Labor Journal published an article stating that, because of a violation of their contract with the teamsters’ union, the employers had been placed upon the “We Don’t Patronize” list. Certain labor organizations and their officers, against whom compensatory and punitive damages were awarded, assert that they had nothing to do with the publication of the article. As additional grounds for reversal of the judgment, they and the owners of the newspaper,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers Local 802 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. WohlSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Milk Wagon Drivers' Union, Local No. 753 v. Lake Valley Farm Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. J. F. Parkinson Co. v. Building Trades CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067California Supreme Court · 1940

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API