Legal Opinion

Piper v. Eakle

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1931No. 5103PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

This is an action at law by the plaintiff and respondent against the defendant and appellant to recover for damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff on account of the negligence of defendant in driving his Ford truck upon and against the plaintiff’s Chevrolet coupe automobile, which was parked parallel to the curb in front of plaintiff’s home.

The trial court found in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant, and defendant appeals. Appellant makes a number of assignments of error which relate to the findings of the court as to: First, that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Everett v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Dillon Implement Co. v. CleavelandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hillyard v. District Court of Cache CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Mitchell v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Baker v. Hatch, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kinkella v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. One (1) Porsche 2-Door, I.D. No. 911211026, Title No. PP10026F Bearing Kansas License Plate No. JOR 1652Utah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Duncan v. Hemmelwright Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Parish v. ParishUtah Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API