Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Brady
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided July 19, 1990No. IP 88-1311-CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON RULE 4(j) MOTION TO DISMISS
McKINNEY, District Judge.
This Title VII and Privacy Act cause comes before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to effect service within 120 days of filing the complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss.
I. Facts:1
Plaintiff Stephanie Patterson began full-time employment with the Internal Revenue Service in Indianapolis in 1982. During April of 1987 the position of Supervisory Appeals Aid became available at the local I.R.S. office, and Ms. Patterson applied for the job. However, she was not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Arthur Lewis v. Gordon H. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- W. Foster Sellers v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Dr. S.B. Pardazi v. Cullman Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- George Kersh v. Norman DerozierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Hoffman v. Baltimore Police Dept.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Poulakis v. AmtrakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Cloyd v. Arthur Anderson & Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1993
- Campbell v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.