Legal Opinion
Poulakis v. Amtrak
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 25, 1991No. 90 C 6921PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, Chief Judge.
On May 29, 1991, this court concluded that plaintiff Pete Poulakis had demonstrated good cause for his failure to serve defendant Amtrak within the 120-day time period set forth by Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j). Defendant has filed a motion for reconsideration of that ruling, which we deny. Plaintiff has filed additional documentation in further support of his motion for appointment of counsel, a motion on which, for the reasons set forth below, we cannot yet rule.
Amtrak’s Motion for Reconsideration
In response to this court’s request that plaintiff file a written…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- David Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Rita Kips Ayer, Universal Aircraft Corporation, S.A., United States of America v. Rita Kips AyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Payton Randle v. Victor Welding Supply Company and Norman Carlson, Director of Federal IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Robert M. NorwoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jacobs v. University of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- Campbell v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Williams v. Publix WarehouseDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- Del Raine v. CarlsonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1994
- Howard v. SheltonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.