Legal Opinion
Cloyd v. Arthur Anderson & Co.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 28, 1993No. Civ. No. 92-C-1080WPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WINDER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant Arthur Anderson & Company’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss under Rule 4(j) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”), Defendant’s Second Motion to Dismiss, and Plaintiff Timothy A. Cloyd’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve Summons and Complaint (“Motion to Enlarge Time”). No hearing was requested concerning these motions and the court deems such unnecessary. Having fully considered the submissions filed regarding these motions, and being fully advised of the law, the court renders…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Winters v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- George Kersh v. Norman DerozierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Ronald Del Raine v. Norman Carlson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Sheldon Lovelace v. Acme Markets, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tschantz v. McCannDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- Broitman v. Kirkland (In Re Kirkland)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Broitman v. Kirkland (In Re Kirkland)District Court, D. Utah · 1995
- Stanley v. Great Gorge Country ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- CLOUD SYSTEMS HOLDCO IP, LLC v. ACUITY BRANDS SERVICES, INC.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.