Legal Opinion
Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of Hawaii
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 11, 1985No. 84-2172PublishedCited by 186 opinions
1Per curiam
INTRODUCTION
Shihshu Walter Wei filed his complaint in this employment discrimination and civil rights action on October 31, 1983. Wei made no attempt to serve the summons and complaint upon any of the defendants within the 120 day limit prescribed by Rule 4(j) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court dismissed the action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(j) on May 25, 1984. Wei filed an ex parte application for reinstatement of the action on June 4, 1984 together with an affidavit signed by his attorney stating that service had not been effected within the 120 day limit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Patricia Scott Anderson v. Air West, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- M. D. Rutledge v. Electric Hose & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Davidson v. KeenanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Coleman v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Geller v. NewellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Puett v. BlandfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Dennis Hamilton v. Roger v. EndellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Eric David Boudette v. John Barnette, Police Officer James Vaughn, Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Winters v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.