Legal Opinion

State v. McGinnis

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 6, 2004No. AC 23602PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The defendant, Shawn M. McGinnis, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a plea of nolo contendere, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress a statement he made to the police without having been advised of his Miranda1 rights. We remand the case for determination of whether the denial of the motion to suppress was dispositive of the case.

*702The following facts and procedural history are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. GilniteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. State v. Chong ChungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State v. ReveloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CorreaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. State v. ParadisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. CervantesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. State v. MunozConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. State v. DourosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API