Legal Opinion

State v. Paradis

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 27, 2005No. AC 24194PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

The defendant, Victor Paradis, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a conditional plea of nolo contendere, of possession of narcotics with the intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims, inter alia, 1 that the court improperly relied on the testimony of police officers regarding the execution of a search warrant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our discussion. Christopher Brody, a New Britain police officer, arranged a “controlled buy”…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. State v. DeFuscoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. State v. GilniteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bernadyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. State v. JanulawiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. State v. MilotteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. State v. MunozConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. Dunleavey v. Paris Ceramics USA, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API