State v. Paradis
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Victor Paradis, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a conditional plea of nolo contendere, of possession of narcotics with the intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims, inter alia, 1 that the court improperly relied on the testimony of police officers regarding the execution of a search warrant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our discussion. Christopher Brody, a New Britain police officer, arranged a “controlled buy”…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. DeFuscoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. GilniteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bernadyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- State v. JanulawiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. MilotteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. MunozConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Dunleavey v. Paris Ceramics USA, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.