Legal Opinion

State v. Munoz

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 2, 2007No. AC 27476PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUPONT, J.

The defendant, Diego Munoz, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court following his conditional plea of nolo contendere 1 pursuant to General Statutes § 54-94a 2 to risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2). 3 The plea followed the court’s ruling that evidence of three incidents of prior uncharged sexual misconduct, involving two witnesses, was admissible to show the intent of the defendant to commit the crime and followed the court’s determination that its ruling was dispositive of the case. The defendant claims that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. State v. McKenzie-AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KantorowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. STATE, EX REL. HORNE v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. State v. JevarjianConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. People v. SusuicoSuperior Court of Guam · 2025
  5. State v. JosephConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API