Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. Winningham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1909No. 7774PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered September 1, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This case was here on a former appeal. See 48 Wash. 374, 93 Pac. 534. The suit was instituted by the respondents for the purpose of quieting title to certain real estate. Respondents claim title through the purchaser at a guardian’s sale. The appellants were the former owners of the property, and in their cross-complaint have attacked the validity of the sale. This appeal is from a decree in favor *20of the respondents. Numerous errors are assigned, but as we view the case it will be necessary to consider only two of the points urged. They are, (1) error in admitting in evidence the deposition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pape v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Patterson v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Donaldson v. WinninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Ashe v. George M. Beasley & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Inhabitants of Minot v. Inhabitants of BridgewaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tootle v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. In Re Pompal's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Donaldson v. WinninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Dietrich v. Dr. Koch Vegetable Tea Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Bernhard Stern & Sons, Inc. v. ChagnonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API