Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1884PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant, and alleged in his declaration that “ on or about the 27th day of March, 1883, the plaintiff was proceeding on a train of cars running from Toledo, Ohio, to Columbus, Ohio, on the Columbus, Hocking Yalley & Toledo Bail way, and was a regular passenger upon said train, and said train had reached a point at East Toledo, where, from the main line on which it was proceeding, there branched off a side line running up the east branch of the Maumee river, upon which branch line the said defendant was moving a train of cars, and it was the duty of the said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campau v. DeweyMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Wattles v. MossMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. National Masonic Acc. Ass'n of Des Moines v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Denver & R. G. R. v. RodderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  3. Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API