Legal Opinion

Bernhard Stern & Sons, Inc. v. Chagnon

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 10, 1917Published

Assumpsit.

1Opinion of the CourtVincent, J.

This is an action of assumpsit for damages for breach of contract. The plaintiff is the manufacturer of ,a brand of flour known by the name of “Spearhead Patent Flour.” The defendant is a baker. On April 26,1915, one F. W. Choat, an agent of the plaintiff, sold to the defendant -three carloads of flour, amounting to six hundred and thirty barrels, at $7.75 per barrel, the transaction being evidenced by a written order signed by the defendant.

Prior to ordering the flonr the defendant obtained a sample thereof, consisting of two barrels, which he used and found satisfactory.

The defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Patterson v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Wiener v. WhippleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Heard v. CleggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Donaldson v. WinninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API