Legal Opinion

Gernand v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 18, 1966No. 233-64PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDureee, Judge

This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The versions of the facts, as submitted by the two parties are rather different; however, the factual variances are unimportant in light of our ultimate holding that plaintiff has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies.

Plaintiff’s version of the facts may be briefly summarized-. Effective February 23,1958 plaintiff was employed as a Clerk Typist, Kegistrar Division, Mount Alto Hospital, Washington, D.C., Grade G'S-3. As a result of an incident that arose an connection with plaintiff’s employment on the morning of July…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Curtis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Adler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. McDougall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
  5. Hutton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Albert Piccone v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Barber ex rel. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Wilmot v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Dean v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  5. Baskin v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API