Gernand v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDureee, Judge
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The versions of the facts, as submitted by the two parties are rather different; however, the factual variances are unimportant in light of our ultimate holding that plaintiff has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies.
Plaintiff’s version of the facts may be briefly summarized-. Effective February 23,1958 plaintiff was employed as a Clerk Typist, Kegistrar Division, Mount Alto Hospital, Washington, D.C., Grade G'S-3. As a result of an incident that arose an connection with plaintiff’s employment on the morning of July…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Curtis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Adler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- McDougall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- Hutton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Albert Piccone v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Barber ex rel. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Wilmot v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Dean v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Baskin v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.