Legal Opinion
Dean v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 11, 1986No. 230-83CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This is a military pay case which comes before this court on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. The question presented is whether the Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Records properly determined that plaintiff was not entitled to recover survivor annuity bene*565fits under the Survivor Benefit Plan. 10 U.S.C. §§ 1447-1455 (1982). The court concludes that the Board’s determinations were erroneous and that plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
FACTS
Plaintiff, Ms. Dolores Hammarstrom Dean, is the widow of Air Force Colonel John F.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ashley v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Ellen M. Kelly v. The United States, Rosemary J. McCarthy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Pride v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- City of Gettysburg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.