Legal Opinion

Baker v. State ex rel. Mills

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1887No. 12,304PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Erom the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Appellant was the defendant below. The substance of the complaint against him, verified by the relatrix, Clara Mills, is, that in January, 1883, the-State, upon *48“her relation, recovered judgment against appellant and one ■Gray; that appellant has fraudulently concealed, removed, conveyed and transferred his property subject to execution, with intent to -defraud and delay the relatrix in the collection of the judgment; that he has moneys, rights, credits ■and effects, with which the judgment might be paid, and which he fraudulently withholds and conceals, with a view to ■delay and defraud the…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Veeder v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Stowell v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Bruker v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Butler v. JaffrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Scherer v. IngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Towns v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Vinson v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  5. Sherlock v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API