Legal Opinion
Grogan v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of East Hampton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of East Hampton dated November 23, 1993, as required the petitioners to grant a scenic-and-conservation easement to the Town of East *442Hampton as a condition of approving the construction of an addition to their home, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Stark, J.), entered July 27, 1994, which denied the petition.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioners’ contention, the respondent’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Seawall Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Orellano v. Samples Tire Equipment & Supply Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York City, Inc. v. HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelley v. New York State Martin Luther KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Bailey v. Brookdale University Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Bonnie Briar Syndicate, Inc. v. Town of MamaroneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Smith v. Town of MendonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Atlantic Ready Mix, Inc. v. MacedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008