Legal Opinion

Atlantic Ready Mix, Inc. v. Macedo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

*638We agree with the Supreme Court that the determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Mineola (hereinafter the ZBA) denying so much of the application as sought a use variance was rational and not arbitrary and capricious, as the petitioners failed to establish a basis for the granting of such a variance (see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig, 98 NY2d 304 [2002]). The ZBA also properly denied, as academic, so much of the application as sought an area variance.

The petitioners’ contentions that they had been using the subject property lawfully before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ifrah v. UtschigNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Torres v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Clowry v. Town of PawlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Grogan v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Berbenich v. SchoenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API