Legal Opinion

North Carolina National Bank v. Corbett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1967No. 192PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The sole question discussed in appellant’s brief and on the oral argument is this: Does the failure to insert in the guaranty a limitation on the guarantor’s liability render the instrument ■void? In this instance the borrower was the husband of the guarantor. He was in the business of building houses. From time to time he needed advancements from his bank. Mr. and Mrs. Corbett held some, if not all, of their real estate as tenants by the entireties. Such real estate may not be held liable for the individual debts of either husband or wife. However, it is liable for the obligations of both.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Aaser v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Chew v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Suits v. Old Equity Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Craftique, Inc. v. Stevens and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. Howard Communications Corporation, Robert T. HowardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. Amoco Oil Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API