Legal Opinion

Suits v. Old Equity Life Insurance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1959No. 601PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The defendant has abandoned all assignments of error except No. 9 which presents the question whether the plaintiff’s evidence, in the light most favorable to him, was sufficient to qualify him for further benefits under Part H of his policy. The question is one of law. Ward v. Smith, 223 N.C. 141, 25 S.E. 2d 463. The policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant company is designated “Lifetime Income Protection Policy.” Part A provides for loss or, under certain conditions, the loss of use of members of the body. The defendant has paid the maximum 'benefits for the loss of both feet. Part…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Reeves v. Midland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Ward v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Wade v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Muncie v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Briggs v. American & Efird Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Walsh v. United Insurance Company of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Pennsylvania Life Insurance v. BumbreyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
  5. Duke v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API