Legal Opinion

Massie v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 8, 2010No. 09-1087PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs are a class of former residents of Third East Hills Park (“Third East Hills Park” or “the property”), an apartment development in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, who formed a co-op known as Third East Hills Park, Inc. (the “Coop”). 1 The Co-op entered into a project-based Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments (“HAP”) contract with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). 2 Pursuant to the HAP contract, HUD would pay a portion of the monthly rent on behalf of eligible low-income tenants. Plaintiffs filed this class…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cho v. BlackBerry Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  2. Matthew Faush v. Tuesday MorningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. Minard Run Oil Co. v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. State of South Carolina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  5. William Morgan v. Covington TwpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API