Legal Opinion
State of South Carolina v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 26, 2018No. 18-1148PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Circuit Judge:
*745 The United States of America, the Department of Energy, the National Nuclear Security Administration, and two federal officials in their official capacities (collectively, the "DOE"), appeal from adverse rulings concerning the DOE's failure to comply with federal statutory obligations to remove not less than one metric ton of defense plutonium from South Carolina by January 1, 2016. After South Carolina sued in that regard, the district court for the District of South Carolina invoked an enforcement provision of the Administrative Procedure Act (the "APA") and awarded…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Ansberto Gonzalez v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- State of South Carolina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Casa De Md. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland SEC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Casa De Maryland, Incorporated v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Org. for Competitive Markets v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.