Legal Opinion
Anchorage Sand & Gravel Co. v. Schubert
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided September 8, 1953No. Civ. A-8385, A-8422, A-8423PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
The foregoing actions were brought under the provisions of 30 U.S.C.A. § 30, to determine the right of possession under the mining laws of the United States to a part of the public lands reserved to the Territory of Alaska for school purposes by the Act of March 4, 1915, 38 Stat. 1214, 48 U.S.C.A. § 353. Since the consolidation of these actions, the defendant, Territory of Alaska, has moved to dismiss on the following grounds that:(1) The discovery of sand and gravel is not, and was not at the time of making the alleged mineral discoveries, a legal basis sufficient to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. Iron Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hendler v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Loney v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Dunbar Lime Co. v. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
3Cited by11 opinions
- Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Norken Corp. v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Western Nuclear, Inc. v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1979
- United States v. TooleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1963
- United States v. SchaubDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.