Legal Opinion

Occidental Chemical Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Occidental Chemical Company 1 (Employer) petitions this court for review of that portion of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) reversing the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) that granted Employer a credit for Supplemental Unemployment Benefit (SUB) payments made to William Knight (Claimant). We affirm.

In 1992, Claimant filed a Claim Petition alleging that he sustained a work-related injury to his left knee and leg in mid to late January of 1992. (R.R. at 40R.) Employer filed an answer denying the aver-ments in Claimant’s Claim Petition.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Olivetti Corp. of AmericaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Toborkey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Hildebrand v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rite Aid Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Kelly v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Dana Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Bucceri v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rite Aid Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API