Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rite Aid Corp.)

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2002PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Denise Kramer (Claimant) petitions for review of a June 26, 2001 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to deny Claimant’s Petition to Review Compensation Benefit Offset (Offset Review Petition). The WCJ had determined that Rite Aid Corporation (Employer) was entitled, under section 204(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act),1 to take a credit for severance benefits paid to Claimant. We reverse.

Claimant sustained a work-related injury on February 20, 1998, while working at Employer’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Meier v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Township of Lower Merion v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Dietrich Industries, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Bingnear v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Hulmes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Hurst v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Daley v. Spinnaker Industries, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API