Legal Opinion

Dana Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Dana Corporation (Employer) petitions for review of a December 1, 2000 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming a determination by the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) that Employer was not entitled to a credit for supplemental unemployment benefits paid to Robin Beck (Claimant) under section 204(a) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). 1 We affirm.

On April 23, 1997, Claimant filed a Claim Petition alleging that he suffered a disabling work-related injury to his low back and left foot on April 29, 1994. Employer denied all material allegations in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Olivetti Corp. of AmericaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Toborkey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Occidental Chemical Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Mosley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Bucceri v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API