Legal Opinion
Geffcken v. D'ANDREA
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 2006No. B176232PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VEGAN, J.
Eva Geffcken (Eva) and Alexander M. Geffcken (Alexander) appeal from the judgments entered against them and in favor of respondents. Appellants claim that they were exposed to mold mycotoxins at their residence. Eva also claims that she was exposed to mold mycotoxins at her place of work. Appellants maintain that the exposure caused them to suffer from various ailments. Respondents allegedly were responsible for the management, maintenance, or construction of the properties.
Appellants contend that the trial court erroneously granted respondents’ motions in limine (1) to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. WilkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Montgomery Mutual Insurance v. ChessonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Santillan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Pedeferri v. Seidner EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop etc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Uspenskaya v. MelineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.