Pedeferri v. Seidner Enterprises
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOFFSTADT, J. *
Does a commercial vendor owe a duty of care to persons on or near the roadway who are injured as a result of the vendor’s negligence in loading and securing cargo in a vehicle in a way that distracts the vehicle’s driver? Applying the controlling principles of California law, we conclude that such a duty exists and that a categorical “no duty” exception for vendors should not be created. We also hold that the driver’s negligence in driving under the influence of marijuana does not constitute a superseding cause as a matter of law; instead, the issue of superseding cause…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grotheer v. Escape Adventures, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Hernandez v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- QDOS, Inc. v. Signature Fin., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Jing Huang v. Bicycle Casino, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Kelly v. J.A.W. Land & Trading LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.