Legal Opinion

Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop etc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 2016No. B264947PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOFFSTADT, J.

A monsignor in the Catholic church allegedly molested two teenage boys in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s; while doing so, he allegedly lavished them with meals, clothes, travel and money. The victims, now both men in their 50’s, sued the archdiocese for damages in 2014. Insurance Code section 11583 tolls the statute of limitations period once a “person” makes an “advance payment or partial payment of damages” unless he notifies the recipient of the applicable statute of limitations period or until the recipient hires a lawyer. (§ 11583.) Did the monsignor’s…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Belcher v. CSAA Insurance Services CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Beverage v. Apple, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Chancellor v. Ozzello CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Dominguez v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Dominguez v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API