Brenneke v. Smallman
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Maguire & Gallagher, and James G. Maguire, for Appellant. Frank Schilling, R. Percy Wright, and J. J. Roche, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage, and the appeal by defendant A. H. Smallman is from a judgment of foreclosure in favor of Louis Brenneke, and an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs, Louis Brenneke and Lena Brenneke, are, and have been at all times in the complaint mentioned, husband and wife. It is alleged that defendant A. H. Smallman, on January 5, 1900, borrowed from plaintiff Louis Brenneke $1,000, and made and delivered to him, through plaintiff Lena Brenneke, a promissory note, which is set out in full. The note…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ames v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Fennell v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Henehan v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Rowe v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stafford v. MartinoniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Minor v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Steiner v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- West Madison State Bank v. MuddAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
- Minor v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.