Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1901No. S.F. No. 1856PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action for the recovery of money alleged to have been on deposit with defendant, belonging to plaintiff’s testate at her death. Defendant had judgment, from which and from the order denying motion" for new trial plaintiff appeals. The court found the following facts: That decedent intermarried with John Nicholson, November 22, 1877, and they lived together as man and wife, until her death, May 20, 1894; decedent’s name at the marriage was Hannah Lane (she being then the widow of one Michael Lane), and at that time, —to wit, November 22, 1877—she had on deposit with defendant the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fennell v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Capeon v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Davis v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PepperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Cavanaugh v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Stafford v. MartinoniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Estate of RollsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API