Legal Opinion
Steiner v. Davis
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1938No. Civ. 2101PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment after a demurrer to an amended complaint had been sustained and the plaintiff had refused to amend. The only question involved is whether it appears from the face of the complaint that the cause of action attempted to be set up was barred by the statute of limitations.
The action is one to recover a balance upon a promissory note for $3,000 dated May 6, 1919, payable three years after date to Mrs. B. W. Kies and signed “Byron Dade Davis”. A copy of the note is set forth in the complaint and at the bottom thereof appears the following: “Renewed Apr. 21, 1926 B.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Kedey v. PettyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Lime Rock Bank v. MallettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
- Brenneke v. SmallmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Easton v. AshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Hollywood Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Steiner v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938