Legal Opinion

Ulmer v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1956No. Appeal, 285PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Musmanno,

In the early morning of January 15, 1953, William J. Ulmer, 62 years of age, plaintiff in this case, was crossing the Red Lion Road, Bustleton, in order to reach the Budd Company plant, in which he was employed, when he was struck by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant George E. Hamilton, against whom a jury in the ensuing lawsuit returned a verdict of $10,000. Upon being refused judgment n.o.v. in the Court below, the defendant appealed here, urging reversal on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

The E. G. Budd…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eckert v. Merchants Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Arnold v. McKelveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Goldschmidt v. SchumannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCay v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Crane v. NealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Bressler v. YOGURTSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Freund v. HusterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Bovell v. DubruskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API