Legal Opinion

Crane v. Neal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1957No. Appeals, 60 and 61PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Crane and Dean sued Neal in separate actions of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage. Neal sued Crane and Dean in trespass to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage. All the cases were tried together.

Around two o’clock a.m. on March 20, 1954, Crane and Dean were each riding a motorcycle in a westerly direction on Route 358 and were approaching the Borough of Greenville. The night was dark and it was raining. The engine of Crane’s motorcycle stopped so Crane and Dean parked their motorcycles on the paved portion of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Kasanovich v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. McDonald v. FerrebeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Brusis v. HenkelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Finnin v. NeubertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Hanna M. Ayoub and Margaret Ayoub, His Wife v. Dr. H. N. Spencer, M. D.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. McCay v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Francis C. O'Neill and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United States v. Ambrose-Augusterfer Corporation, Third-Party Francis C. O'NeillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  4. Wilson v. American Chain & Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  5. Vernon v. StashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API