Freund v. Huster
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Bell,
This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit. In such a case the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, and he must be given the benefit of every reasonable deduction or inference of fact arising therefrom. Finnin v. Neubert, 378 Pa. 40, 105 A. 2d 77; Schofield v. King, 388 Pa. 132, 130 A. 2d 93; Seburn v. Luzerne & Carbon County M. T. Co., 394 Pa. 577, 148 A. 2d 534.
Moreover a nonsuit can be entered only in a clear case. Gift v. Palmer, 392 Pa. 628, 141 A. 2d 408; Schofield v. King, 388 Pa., supra; Seburn v. Luzerne & Carbon County M.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schofield v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Balla v. SladekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Finnin v. NeubertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Gift v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Robinson v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kirk v. Brentwood Manor Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Castelli v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Rice v. ShumanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.