Legal Opinion

Goldschmidt v. Schumann

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1931No. Appeals, 189 and 190PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, afoot, came to the pave, ment on the north side of Cliveden Avenue, fifty feet wide between curbs, at the crossing provided for pedestrians, intending to cross that thoroughfare to its south side. It was raining and the husband was carrying an umbrella which sheltered both of them, his wife on his right arm. She testified that when they reached the north side pavement she saw no automobile on the avenue; she did not specifically say that she looked to see if any was approaching. She further testified that before stepping from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Newman v. Protective Motor Service Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Robinson v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Smathers v. Pittsburg & Butler Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Young v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crane v. NealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Grimes v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Long v. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Dempsey v. Cuneo Eastern, Press Ink Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Ulmer v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API