Legal Opinion

State v. . Hargrove

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Tbe appellant assigns as error tbe denial of bis motion for judgment as of nonsuit entered at tbe close of tbe State’s evidence and renewed at tbe close of all tbe evidence.

An examination of tbe evidence as disclosed by tbe record leads us to tbe conclusion tbat tbe case was properly submitted to tbe jury. S. v. Coffey, 210 N. C., 561, 187 S. E., 754; S. v. Bridgers, 172 N. C., 879, 89 S. E., 804. As the judge’s charge was not sent up, it must be presumed that the jury was properly instructed by the trial judge as to all phases of the case, both with respect to the law and the evidence.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. State v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. State v. . NanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. State v. . BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. State v. . NolandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. . HedgebethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Bell v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. CranfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API