Legal Opinion

State v. . Noland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1933PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was indicted and convicted of offering a bribe to Hurst Justice, a qualified juror serving in a criminal action entitled "State v. W. B. Davis et al.," tried at a Special Term of the Superior Court of Buncombe County, which was convened in July, 1931. From the judgment pronounced he appealed to the Supreme Court upon assigned error. Hurst Justice, the juror, H. L. Justice his father, and W. B. Noland the defendant, are residents of Haywood County. The State's evidence tends to show that while the criminal action against Davis and his codefendants was being tried in Asheville,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . BrodieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. . LytleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. State v. Godwin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Howell v. . SolomonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. . LitteralSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API