Legal Opinion

State v. . Nance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1928PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was convicted of seduction, and appealed from a judgment sentencing him to serve a term of three years in the State prison. There was sufficient evidence upon all the essential elements of the crime to be submitted to the jury, and the only exception meriting serious consideration occurs upon the following excerpt from the record: "During the argument to the jury of Mr. F. B. Benbow, one of the counsel for the defendant, he turned to the acting solicitor and said, in substance: `Why didn't you put witnesses on the stand to show the defendant's bad character? You scoured the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. State v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Edwards v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. State v. . ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Underwood, Marsh & Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Zirkle v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  3. State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API