Legal Opinion

Bell v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1947PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The appellant only presents in his brief, this question: Was the plaintiff entitled to a directed verdict upon the evidence? His remaining assignments of error will be considered as abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N. C., 562.

Tbe admissions in the trial below eliminated all matters in controversy between tbe parties, except whether or not tbe plaintiff bad released tbe defendant, H. S. Brown, from the option dated 25 September, 1943, and whether or not tbe signature of tbe defendant, Gladys B. Brown, to tbe option and lease, was obtained by false and fraudulent…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Faw v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. Stevens v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Gorrell v. AlspaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Danville Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Gallivan Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. May v. Getty.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Brannock v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Manufacturing Co. v. . Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. State v. . HedgebethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. RubishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API