Legal Opinion

Wayland v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1917No. 13736PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, TaUman, J., entered March 20, 1916, upon the verdicts of a jury, awarding damages in condemnation proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— The city of Seattle, by ordinance, provided for widening and extending a street situated within its boundaries, known in the record as Northlake avenue. The work required taking and damaging certain tracts of land owned in severalty by a number of persons. This action was brought to condemn the necessary land and to ascertain the just compensation required to be paid to the several owners. Among the tracts of land taken and damaged, were tracts belonging to the appellants in this action, who appeal because dissatisfied with the award made them. The errors assigned all relate to rulings of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Seattle v. WaldWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Seattle v. Dexter Horton Trust & Savings BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. City of Seattle v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Klodek v. May Creek Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CalkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State v. RowleyWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in the County of Arlington, State of Virginia, and Howard W. SilsbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  4. In Re City of MedinaWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. American State Bank v. ButtsWashington Supreme Court · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API